Risk

Will Innovation Withstand Regulators’ Microscope

Finite insurance the unfair target of regulators, panel says

By David Gambrill | October 31, 2005

4 min read

The Case for Side A Insurance

How can an independent director be better protected from management fraud that can't be discovered through diligence? D&O insurance appears to offer a reasonable degree of protection to the independent director. But the precise type of D&O insurance is of crucial importance - a Side A DIC policy, for example, may provide for broad severability, meaning that fraud on the part of management may not result in the coverage being rescinded against all insureds.

By David Price & Jordan S. Solway, Arch Insurance Group (Canada) | October 31, 2005

7 min read

Finite Insurance: What is the real problem?

One of the basic difficulties in determining whether there is a real problem with finite reinsurance is that there is no clear difference between it and normal reinsurance. U.S. regulators are concerned insurance companies will use finite insurance as a means to smooth earnings and thereby cover up financial problems. But one of the difficulties in determining whether there is a real problem with finite reinsurance is the fact that all types of insurance and reinsurance are also intended to smooth their earnings and reduce volatility.

By Brian Reeve, partner at Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP | October 31, 2005

6 min read

Protecting Individual and Commercial Policyholders

Over the next year, the Property and Casualty Insurance Compensation Corporation (PACICC) will conduct a comprehensive review of the coverage and benefits it provides to policyholders in the rare circumstances of a member insurer becoming insolvent. PACICC protection currently applies to about 94% of the premiums underwritten by private P&C insurers in Canada. Major lines […]

By Jim Harries, Paul Kovacs, and Darrell Leadbetter | October 31, 2005

6 min read