Risk

September 11 Will Change Canadian Insurers

The indirect consequences of the September 11 terrorist attacks on the U.S. will have a far greater impact on the insurance industry in Canada than the direct costs resulting from the tragedy. Few Canadian companies will be directly affected.

By Joel Baker, GM, A.M. Best Canada Ltd. and Robert Adams, asst. VP, A.M. Best Co. | November 30, 2001

5 min read

Back Stop…or “Stopped”

With the deadline for yearend reinsurance renewals rapidly drawing near, a political game of “chicken” appears to be in play between insurers, reinsurers and the federal government. The Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC) established a special task group following the September 11 terrorism attacks in the U.S. to establish what future risks and consequences could […]

By Sean van Zyl, Editor | November 30, 2001

4 min read

Financing Terrorism Risks a Backstop, Not Bailout

In the wake of the September 11 terrorist attacks in the U.S., which sparked concerns globally of a reinsurance withdrawal from covering such risks, the Insurance Bureau of Canada has presented a proposal to the federal government that would see the creation of a temporary reinsurance mechanism available to insurers.

By Stan Griffin, executive vice president of regional operations at the IBC | November 30, 2001

4 min read

Terrorism Risks the Exclusion Dilemma

Terrorism exclusions in Canadian property policies, are they necessary? As the deadline for reinsurance renewals nears, many insurers are looking for alternative solutions to the vexing problem of providing - or not providing - coverage for terrorism related risks.

By Brian Reeve, partner at Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP | November 30, 2001

7 min read